Preparing the appliance was quick and easy: I modified the IP addresses and network names to be consistent with my LAN, then defined a few shares on the appliance volumes, and added test users to WSS. For this simple configuration, I created test users from scratch, but WSS can easily integrate with the Active Directory domain of existing servers, further streamlining user management.

WSS supports sharing protocols that give access to Apple, Linux, Microsoft, NetWare, and Unix clients. Administrators can define shares retrievable via HTTP and FTP, an appropriate action for giving access to remote users or unsupported clients. For example, I was able to open an HTTP-enabled share from Netscape Navigator on a Linux machine.

When creating a share, the WSS GUI offers a handful of very useful options that improve reliability and to simplify managing users’ files. To minimize disruptions when moving a user directory elsewhere, for instance, new shares can be published to a DFS (distributed file system) root, which preserves users’ access to their files.

Because WSS is based on Windows Server 2003, it supports shadow copies for shared folders -- again, an option driven from the GUI -- which allows users to recover previous versions of a file. That’s a much-needed feature if a file is mistakenly deleted or damaged.

WSS also has powerful tools that help administrators control their NAS. Built-in reports give an administrator a summary of storage resource information such as the number of files, the space required for backup, and a breakdown by file type. More detailed reports can pinpoint duplicate files as well as large, rarely accessed files and files that are never backed up.

Administrators also have more proactive tools to corral users’ behavior, such as setting quotas to limit the amount of space used and defining policies to block specific file extensions. It took me only minutes to create policies that stopped my test users from saving executable files to a shared folder.

By the end of this first experience with WSS, the only major downside was that some of its new features were not reviewable on the white box. For example, the iSCSI protocol or FC (Fibre Channel) adapters can extend the capacity of a NAS appliance beyond the size of its internal drives, but my test machine’s hardware didn’t offer those options.

Some of those features should become visible when storage vendors bind more resourceful hardware to WSS 3.0. Activating other features will probably require Microsoft partners to tune their applications to the new OS.

Still, I liked what I saw in WSS 3.0. It combines good security, powerful administration tools, and support for major sharing protocols, which can make a NAS appliance very easy to use and manage.

InfoWorld Scorecard
Ease of use (10.0%)
Interoperability (20.0%)
Security (20.0%)
Microsoft Windows Storage Server 3.09.08.08.09.09.08.08.6